A dodgy occupation
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0205) 2 February 2002, 128(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Discusses recent CA decision "Lloyd and others v Dugdale and another" [2001] , which examined how proprietary estoppel could be used to overcome the absence of a lease agreement, but illustrates that such rights will not readily bind a successor in title, where the claimant is not in occupation.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3805-21 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116634-1001 |
Discusses recent CA decision "Lloyd and others v Dugdale and another" [2001] , which examined how proprietary estoppel could be used to overcome the absence of a lease agreement, but illustrates that such rights will not readily bind a successor in title, where the claimant is not in occupation.