Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 06 EG 156-163(8)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: CA 20 November 2001. Tenant (B) issued a notice on 9 October 1999 claiming a new lease under Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s42, proposing a premium of £110 000. Landlord(M) issued a counternotice proposing a premium of £175 000. B appealed against the CC's decision, which dismissed his claim that M's counternotice was invalid, as it had failed to admit B's claim to a new lease, as required by s45(2)(a) of 1993 Act. CA held that counternotice was invalid, overturning CC's ruling. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS65168 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116958-1001 |
CA 20 November 2001. Tenant (B) issued a notice on 9 October 1999 claiming a new lease under Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s42, proposing a premium of £110 000. Landlord(M) issued a counternotice proposing a premium of £175 000. B appealed against the CC's decision, which dismissed his claim that M's counternotice was invalid, as it had failed to admit B's claim to a new lease, as required by s45(2)(a) of 1993 Act. CA held that counternotice was invalid, overturning CC's ruling. Appeal allowed.