Fence Gate Ltd v NEL Construction Ltd
Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; [2002] CILL 1817-1824(8)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: TCC 5 December 2002. Fence Gate Ltd (F) submitted that the Arbitrator in its dispute with NEL Construction (N) had erroneously taken into account factors that he should not have taken into account and vice versa when making his award. "Held:" The errors of law made by the Arbitrator, and their extent, meant that the ward should be set aside. The court varied the award as there would have the potential for unfairness and lack of impartiality had it been remitted to the tribunal.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS65133 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117088-1001 |
TCC 5 December 2002. Fence Gate Ltd (F) submitted that the Arbitrator in its dispute with NEL Construction (N) had erroneously taken into account factors that he should not have taken into account and vice versa when making his award. "Held:" The errors of law made by the Arbitrator, and their extent, meant that the ward should be set aside. The court varied the award as there would have the potential for unfairness and lack of impartiality had it been remitted to the tribunal.