Not absolutely evident
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0210) 9 March 2003, 154(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: The third in a series of four articles on statutory notices discusses the issue of 'evident error' and emphasises the importance of statutory requirements. Examines the recent case "Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd " where the Court of Appeal had to consider whether a landlord's counternotice under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s45 had been valid. For the case see Abs63736.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3810-19 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117108-1001 |
The third in a series of four articles on statutory notices discusses the issue of 'evident error' and emphasises the importance of statutory requirements. Examines the recent case "Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd " where the Court of Appeal had to consider whether a landlord's counternotice under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s45 had been valid. For the case see Abs63736.