R (on the application of Curzon Berkeley Ltd) v Bliss (VO)
Series: Rating Appeals ; [2002] RA 45-62(10)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: QBD 19 December 2001. Application for judicial review by ratepayer (R) to quash alterations made by the valuation officer (VO) in the rating list from domestic to non-domestic on self-contained serviced apartments at 39 Hill Street and 56 Curzon Street. R challenged the alterations on the grounds that firstly the VO had failed to clarify which parts of the building remained under the council tax regime and which were subject to non-domestic rates, and secondly with respect to 39 Hill Street R claimed that as freeholder he was not the relevant person defined in the Local Government Financt Act 1988. The first challenge was rejected but second challenge allowed, quashing the alterations on 39 Hill Street.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS65445 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117898-1001 |
QBD 19 December 2001. Application for judicial review by ratepayer (R) to quash alterations made by the valuation officer (VO) in the rating list from domestic to non-domestic on self-contained serviced apartments at 39 Hill Street and 56 Curzon Street. R challenged the alterations on the grounds that firstly the VO had failed to clarify which parts of the building remained under the council tax regime and which were subject to non-domestic rates, and secondly with respect to 39 Hill Street R claimed that as freeholder he was not the relevant person defined in the Local Government Financt Act 1988. The first challenge was rejected but second challenge allowed, quashing the alterations on 39 Hill Street.