J Murphy and Sons Ltd v Railtrack plc
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 31 EG 99 (3/8/2002) | Property and Compensation Reports ; [2003] 1 P&CR 91-99(9)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: CA 29 April 2002, where the judge was entirely correct to have concluded that premises that were the subject of the proceedings were to be treated as landlocked for the purpose of the grant of a new tenancy and in particular for the purpose of the calculation of the rent payable pursuant to Part II Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The landlord (R) was unable to to grant an easement or right of way to the property leased by the tenant (M). The lack of access could not be disregarded. Held: the appeal was dismissed. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s34(1) contained all the necessary guidance.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65847 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 119302-1001 |
CA 29 April 2002, where the judge was entirely correct to have concluded that premises that were the subject of the proceedings were to be treated as landlocked for the purpose of the grant of a new tenancy and in particular for the purpose of the calculation of the rent payable pursuant to Part II Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The landlord (R) was unable to to grant an easement or right of way to the property leased by the tenant (M). The lack of access could not be disregarded. Held: the appeal was dismissed. The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s34(1) contained all the necessary guidance.