Image from Google Jackets

Robert Fidler v First SoS and Reigate and Banstead BC

Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; [2004] JPL 630-653(24)Publication details: 2003Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2003] EWHC 2003 (Admin), 1 October 2003. Appellant landowner (F) appealed under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289 from a planning inspector's decision upholding enforcement notices. F also made an application under s288 of the Act challenging the inspector's decision in which he found against F on his application for a certificate of lawful development. The inspector quashed enforcement notices B-G in his preliminary findings but upheld A and I notices. He also refused to allow application for certificate of lawful development. "Held", on appeal that the inspector had erred in holding that notice I was valid within s171B(4)(b), upheld the inspector's rejection of the appeal against notice and approached the material change of use correctly. The decision to reject F's application for a certificate of lawful development was upheld. Appeal allowed in part. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS67279 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 124441-1001

[2003] EWHC 2003 (Admin), 1 October 2003. Appellant landowner (F) appealed under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289 from a planning inspector's decision upholding enforcement notices. F also made an application under s288 of the Act challenging the inspector's decision in which he found against F on his application for a certificate of lawful development. The inspector quashed enforcement notices B-G in his preliminary findings but upheld A and I notices. He also refused to allow application for certificate of lawful development. "Held", on appeal that the inspector had erred in holding that notice I was valid within s171B(4)(b), upheld the inspector's rejection of the appeal against notice and approached the material change of use correctly. The decision to reject F's application for a certificate of lawful development was upheld. Appeal allowed in part. View judgment at www.bailii.org.