Image from Google Jackets

Bridgestart Properties Ltd v London Underground Ltd

Series: Rating and Valuation Reporter ; [2004] RVR 18-24(6)Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: ACQ/128/2002, 17 October 2003. Claim for injurious affection for settlement to premises caused by tunnelling for underground railway based on the Land Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 s63 and theLondon Transport Act 1963 s11. Acquiring authority (LU) declared that the claim under s63 of the 1845 Act was time-barred by the Limitation Act 1980 s9(1) as more than six years had lapsed between the date of entry in July 1994 and the giving of the notice of reference to the LT. Claimant (B) declared that LU was estopped from relying on limitation or had waived their right to do so. LT dismissed claim. "Declared" that, i) London Transport Act 1963 s11 was not applicable for damage caused by tunnelling as it applied to operation of railways and not to its construction and, ii) any action brought under the Lands Clauses Consolidation 1845 Act s63 was time-barred. Costs awarded to LU. View decision at www.landstribunal.gov.uk.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS67610 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 125386-1001

ACQ/128/2002, 17 October 2003. Claim for injurious affection for settlement to premises caused by tunnelling for underground railway based on the Land Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 s63 and theLondon Transport Act 1963 s11. Acquiring authority (LU) declared that the claim under s63 of the 1845 Act was time-barred by the Limitation Act 1980 s9(1) as more than six years had lapsed between the date of entry in July 1994 and the giving of the notice of reference to the LT. Claimant (B) declared that LU was estopped from relying on limitation or had waived their right to do so. LT dismissed claim. "Declared" that, i) London Transport Act 1963 s11 was not applicable for damage caused by tunnelling as it applied to operation of railways and not to its construction and, ii) any action brought under the Lands Clauses Consolidation 1845 Act s63 was time-barred. Costs awarded to LU. View decision at www.landstribunal.gov.uk.