Image from Google Jackets

Barratclough (VO) v Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority

Series: Rating Appeals ; [2004] RA 1-14(8)Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Summary: RA/60/2000, 15 January 2004. VO appealed against valuation tribunal decision allowing ratepayer T's appeal which held that premises occupied by T as headquarters offices should be deleted from the rating list as a separate hereditament. LT allowed VO's appeal on the grounds that the building was not operational land,since taking account of the surroundings, the situation of the hereditament in relation to other parts of the undertaking, and the nature of the building in terms of its design and function. It was comparable rather with land in general than with statutory undertaking land. Therefore it should be included as a separate entry on the rating list. View decision at www.landstribunal.gov.uk.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS67665 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 125423-1001

RA/60/2000, 15 January 2004. VO appealed against valuation tribunal decision allowing ratepayer T's appeal which held that premises occupied by T as headquarters offices should be deleted from the rating list as a separate hereditament. LT allowed VO's appeal on the grounds that the building was not operational land,since taking account of the surroundings, the situation of the hereditament in relation to other parts of the undertaking, and the nature of the building in terms of its design and function. It was comparable rather with land in general than with statutory undertaking land. Therefore it should be included as a separate entry on the rating list. View decision at www.landstribunal.gov.uk.