Beazer Homes Limited v Peter Stroude
Language: English Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2005] EWCA Civ 265, 17 March 2005. The parties disagreed over the construction of an agreement made in relation to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s106 and the Highways Act 1980 concerning a development involving the construction of a bypass. The dispute was over whether Stroude (S) had a right over certain land for the construction of the bypass. S claimed s106 agreement gave him express right of access but the appellants (B) claimed there should be mutual rights which had been the subject of earlier negotiations. "Held": the appeal was dismissed. The court held that it could only consider the factual background of the agreement not the intentions of the parties.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | L129608 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 129608-1001 |
[2005] EWCA Civ 265, 17 March 2005. The parties disagreed over the construction of an agreement made in relation to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s106 and the Highways Act 1980 concerning a development involving the construction of a bypass. The dispute was over whether Stroude (S) had a right over certain land for the construction of the bypass. S claimed s106 agreement gave him express right of access but the appellants (B) claimed there should be mutual rights which had been the subject of earlier negotiations. "Held": the appeal was dismissed. The court held that it could only consider the factual background of the agreement not the intentions of the parties.