Estate agent's fees
Language: English Series: Independent on Sunday ; 25 April 1993, 18(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: In "Chasen Ryder and Co v Hedges" (CA, Abs48321) the CA decided that the first estate agent, who introduced the vendor to the property, was not entitled to commission. The second estate agent, who approached the vendor with details of redevelopment of the property, were held to have been the 'effective cause' of the sale.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2916-25 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 11794-1001 |
In "Chasen Ryder and Co v Hedges" (CA, Abs48321) the CA decided that the first estate agent, who introduced the vendor to the property, was not entitled to commission. The second estate agent, who approached the vendor with details of redevelopment of the property, were held to have been the 'effective cause' of the sale.