A painful case
Language: English Series: Building ; 270(8410) 9 December 2005, 46-47(2)Publication details: 2005Subject(s): Summary: Outlines the facts of, and comments upon, "CIB Properties Ltd v Birse Construction Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 2365, L130465), whereby B called C to adjudication after being dismissed from a project on which C had made numerous revisions to the building design whilst work was in progress, and C had complained of work being late and defective. The adjudicator found that B had showed no sense of urgency, and could provide no convincing reasons why it should be granted an extension of time. The author argues that B had simply become overwhelmed by the problems encountered on the project, and had allowed work to virtually come to a standstill.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L132062 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 132062-1001 |
Outlines the facts of, and comments upon, "CIB Properties Ltd v Birse Construction Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 2365, L130465), whereby B called C to adjudication after being dismissed from a project on which C had made numerous revisions to the building design whilst work was in progress, and C had complained of work being late and defective. The adjudicator found that B had showed no sense of urgency, and could provide no convincing reasons why it should be granted an extension of time. The author argues that B had simply become overwhelmed by the problems encountered on the project, and had allowed work to virtually come to a standstill.