Image from Google Jackets

Cultural expectations of homeownership explaining changing legal definitions of flat ownership within Britain

By: Language: English Series: Housing Studies ; 21(1) January 2006, 35-52(18)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: Traces the evolution of the legal definition of flat ownership in England, Wales and Scotland. Following the break up of private rented flats in England and Wales and Scotland two distinct property ownership systems emerged, both seeking to provide individual ownership of the flat and collective management of the block in which the flat was contained In England and Wales leasehold ownership retained the previous landlord tenant relationship through allowing positive covenants only to be enforced on the first purchaser of a flat and not subsequent purchasers. In Scotland where outright individual ownership of a flat is legally possible, the management arrangements covering common parts of the building have not proved satisfactory. Argues that neither legal arrangements have put in place an ownership of governance regime that matches popular cultural expectations of what individual home ownership should consist. References.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L132654 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 132654-1001

Traces the evolution of the legal definition of flat ownership in England, Wales and Scotland. Following the break up of private rented flats in England and Wales and Scotland two distinct property ownership systems emerged, both seeking to provide individual ownership of the flat and collective management of the block in which the flat was contained In England and Wales leasehold ownership retained the previous landlord tenant relationship through allowing positive covenants only to be enforced on the first purchaser of a flat and not subsequent purchasers. In Scotland where outright individual ownership of a flat is legally possible, the management arrangements covering common parts of the building have not proved satisfactory. Argues that neither legal arrangements have put in place an ownership of governance regime that matches popular cultural expectations of what individual home ownership should consist. References.