Too much?
Language: English Series: Building ; 271(8424) 31 March 2006, 62-63(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: Reports the facts of, and comments upon, "Rankilor and another v M Igoe Ltd" ([2006] TCC, Salford District Registry,unreported), where it was contended that an adjudicator had made findings of fact based on his expert assessment of a laboratory analysis when the findings had not been contended for by either party, and neither party had had the opportunity to comment upon them. The author argues that an adjudicator should tell the parties how a decision was reached, if one or the other asks for further information, as this may prevent a complaint being made or legal proceedings being taken.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L133029 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133029-1001 |
Reports the facts of, and comments upon, "Rankilor and another v M Igoe Ltd" ([2006] TCC, Salford District Registry,unreported), where it was contended that an adjudicator had made findings of fact based on his expert assessment of a laboratory analysis when the findings had not been contended for by either party, and neither party had had the opportunity to comment upon them. The author argues that an adjudicator should tell the parties how a decision was reached, if one or the other asks for further information, as this may prevent a complaint being made or legal proceedings being taken.