Image from Google Jackets

Adverse possession points of practice

By: Language: English Series: EMIS Property Service ; 4(3) 2006, 3-5(3)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: Reviews the law of adverse possession which has become unsatisfactory following the key cases of "J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom" (ECHR 44302/02, L131742) and "Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer" ([2005] EWHC 817 (Ch), L129526). Examines the four different regimes for adverse possession that practitioners will have to grapple with: registered land before the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) which came into force on 2 October 2000; registered land after the HRA came into force and before the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA) came into force on 13 October 2003; registered land after the LRA, and unregistered land. Concludes that the state of adverse possession law is such that government may be forced to review the law. Notes.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L133038 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 133038-1001

Reviews the law of adverse possession which has become unsatisfactory following the key cases of "J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom" (ECHR 44302/02, L131742) and "Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer" ([2005] EWHC 817 (Ch), L129526). Examines the four different regimes for adverse possession that practitioners will have to grapple with: registered land before the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) which came into force on 2 October 2000; registered land after the HRA came into force and before the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA) came into force on 13 October 2003; registered land after the LRA, and unregistered land. Concludes that the state of adverse possession law is such that government may be forced to review the law. Notes.