Fateful abstractions
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0626) 24 June 2006, 204-205(2)Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Summary: This "Mainly for students" article looks at the surveyor's input to rent review valuations. Includes sections on preparing the valuation, making the inspection, and why this advice matters. Highlights the relevance of judgments made in "United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley BC" (HL [1977] 243 EG 43) and "Plinth Property Investments Ltd v Mott Hay and Anderson" (CA [1978] 249 EG 1167), regarding the rent review timetable and restrictive user clauses respectively.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L133983 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133983-1001 |
This "Mainly for students" article looks at the surveyor's input to rent review valuations. Includes sections on preparing the valuation, making the inspection, and why this advice matters. Highlights the relevance of judgments made in "United Scientific Holdings Ltd v Burnley BC" (HL [1977] 243 EG 43) and "Plinth Property Investments Ltd v Mott Hay and Anderson" (CA [1978] 249 EG 1167), regarding the rent review timetable and restrictive user clauses respectively.