Image from Google Jackets

Monavon Construction Ltd v Simon Davenport and Angelika Davenport

Language: English Publication details: 2006Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWHC 1810 (TCC), 17 July 2006. Considers a contract dispute and costs arising from an action brought by claimant building contractor (M) and cross-claim of defendants (D). M had claimed money due under a construction contract and D had cross-claimed for the costs of defective work (its claim relating to basement dampness had appeared in a late amendment). D had lost on their allegation that there was a cap on their liability to pay M in respect of the construction works, but succeeded in obtaining damages for the costs of repair of many items of defective and incomplete work. D and M sought their costs of the action to be assessed on an indemnity basis, D maintaining this should include both the claim and cross-claim and M contending it should have costs paid up to the date of D's late amendment. "Held": it was appropriate for each party to pay their own costs as their conduct was not found to be unreasonable.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 135409-2001

[2006] EWHC 1810 (TCC), 17 July 2006. Considers a contract dispute and costs arising from an action brought by claimant building contractor (M) and cross-claim of defendants (D). M had claimed money due under a construction contract and D had cross-claimed for the costs of defective work (its claim relating to basement dampness had appeared in a late amendment). D had lost on their allegation that there was a cap on their liability to pay M in respect of the construction works, but succeeded in obtaining damages for the costs of repair of many items of defective and incomplete work. D and M sought their costs of the action to be assessed on an indemnity basis, D maintaining this should include both the claim and cross-claim and M contending it should have costs paid up to the date of D's late amendment. "Held": it was appropriate for each party to pay their own costs as their conduct was not found to be unreasonable.