Image from Google Jackets

Powerhouse case clarifies CVA issues and offers some relief for landlords

By: Language: English Series: Property Forecast ; 10(5) May 2007, 14-15(2)Publication details: 2007Subject(s): Summary: Discusses "Prudential Assurance Co Ltd and others v PRG Powerhouse Ltd and others" ([2007] EWHC 1002 (Ch), L138112) which concerned the validity of a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). Outlines the background to the case, how a CVA can be challenged in accordance with the Insolvency Act 1986 s6(1), key points from the decision, and the impact of ?Powerhouse? on landlords. Whilst the decision in ?Powerhouse? marks an important win for landlords and property investors, landlords should now consider how to protect their guarantees going forward.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article L138407 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 138407-1001

Discusses "Prudential Assurance Co Ltd and others v PRG Powerhouse Ltd and others" ([2007] EWHC 1002 (Ch), L138112) which concerned the validity of a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). Outlines the background to the case, how a CVA can be challenged in accordance with the Insolvency Act 1986 s6(1), key points from the decision, and the impact of ?Powerhouse? on landlords. Whilst the decision in ?Powerhouse? marks an important win for landlords and property investors, landlords should now consider how to protect their guarantees going forward.