Image from Google Jackets

Union Railways (North) Limited v London and Continental Railways Limited and Kent County Council [electronic resource]

Language: English Publication details: 2008Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2008] EWLands ACQ_212_2005, 3 June 2008. Tribunal asked to determine: whether an acquiring authority was entitled , if it chose, not to serve notice to treat an owner of an interest in land that it was taking the land under its compulsory powers and whether a claimant could make reference to the Lands Tribunal if notice to treat had not been served on him. Also asked to decide whether the Lands Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the question of entitlement to compensation. Held: Where land was to be acquired under a compulsory purchase order, the acquiring authority had to give notice to treat to every person with an interest in the land, failing which a person with such an interest could apply to the Lands Tribunal under the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 for determination of their entitlement compensation.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 144341-1001

[2008] EWLands ACQ_212_2005, 3 June 2008. Tribunal asked to determine: whether an acquiring authority was entitled , if it chose, not to serve notice to treat an owner of an interest in land that it was taking the land under its compulsory powers and whether a claimant could make reference to the Lands Tribunal if notice to treat had not been served on him. Also asked to decide whether the Lands Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine the question of entitlement to compensation. Held: Where land was to be acquired under a compulsory purchase order, the acquiring authority had to give notice to treat to every person with an interest in the land, failing which a person with such an interest could apply to the Lands Tribunal under the Compulsory Purchase Act 1965 for determination of their entitlement compensation.