Things are never that simple
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (0839) 4 October 2008, 122-123(2)Publication details: 2008Subject(s):- APPORTIONMENT ACT 1870
- BAIRSTOW EVES (SECURITIES) LTD V RIPLEY
- ELLIS V ROWBOTHAM
- JOHN LAING CONSTRUCTION LTD V AMBER PASS LTD
- LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S196(4)
- LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY LTD V EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL (UK) LTD
- OSBORNE ASSETS LTD V BRITANNIA LIFE LTD
- WEST COUNTRY CLEANERS (FALMOUTH) LTD V SALY
- United Kingdom --
- LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | L145424 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 145424-1001 |
This mainly for students article looks at creating a strategy for tenants seeking to exit a lease making use of a break clause, stating that these can be difficult to take advantage of, especially in cases where use of the clause is subject to conditions. Discusses break notice and payment; associated works and financial statements and the yielding up of vacant possession. The authors also provide various legislative examples to highlight the importance of sticking to the terms of break clauses.