Smith v Prior and Others (expenses) note [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2007Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: LTS/TC/2006/06 2 March 2007. The applicants sought to recover the expenses of an application to discharge a feu charter title restriction (see E147336 for original case). The respondents sought at least the modification of any award of expenses. Case also involved an opposed motion for certification of an expert witness. "Held": The applicants are entitled to the expenses of the application, modified to 60%; The motion for certification of an expert witness for the applicants was refused.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 147337-2001 |
LTS/TC/2006/06 2 March 2007. The applicants sought to recover the expenses of an application to discharge a feu charter title restriction (see E147336 for original case). The respondents sought at least the modification of any award of expenses. Case also involved an opposed motion for certification of an expert witness. "Held": The applicants are entitled to the expenses of the application, modified to 60%; The motion for certification of an expert witness for the applicants was refused.