Image from Google Jackets

Ryan v London Borough of Islington [electronic resource]

Language: English Publication details: 2009Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2009] EWCA Civ 578, 19 June 2009. The case relates to the remedying of subsidence to a local authority flat subject to a right to buy. Ms Ryan (R) had a secure tenancy of a local authority flat. She served notice of her right to buy in January 2003. In June 2003, L noted that specialist works were required, indicating subsidence. The valuer's report did not mention subsidence, however a subsequent inspection diagnosed subsidence to the rear extension. The repairs were not done. R appealed against an order specifying dismissal of her claims for a declaration that her right to buy the property was not withdrawn and for damages in the loss of her right to buy. "Held": Subsidence was not a structural defect. Part V of the Housing Act 1985 contained nothing giving the right of a purchasing tenant to insist on having any structural defects or any items of disrepair to be remedied before completion. L could not be taken to have accepted responsibility for this type of loss. The appeal is dismissed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE JUDGMENT (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 147881-2001

[2009] EWCA Civ 578, 19 June 2009. The case relates to the remedying of subsidence to a local authority flat subject to a right to buy. Ms Ryan (R) had a secure tenancy of a local authority flat. She served notice of her right to buy in January 2003. In June 2003, L noted that specialist works were required, indicating subsidence. The valuer's report did not mention subsidence, however a subsequent inspection diagnosed subsidence to the rear extension. The repairs were not done. R appealed against an order specifying dismissal of her claims for a declaration that her right to buy the property was not withdrawn and for damages in the loss of her right to buy. "Held": Subsidence was not a structural defect. Part V of the Housing Act 1985 contained nothing giving the right of a purchasing tenant to insist on having any structural defects or any items of disrepair to be remedied before completion. L could not be taken to have accepted responsibility for this type of loss. The appeal is dismissed.