Michael Phillips Architects Limited v Cornell Clark Riklin and Susan Oglesby Riklin [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2011Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2011] EWHC 27 (TCC), 12 January 2011. Concerns a claim by an architect (M) for payment of fees for work carried out for the defendants (R). M passed the debt on to a debt collection agency who caused damage to R's car in an attempt to make them pay the debt. The terms of engagement for the project were under dispute as they had not been properly set out in writing prior to the start of work, and some aspects of the work were not properly supervised by M. "Held": M is entitled to £42 047 in fees, however R is entitled to £58 880.98 as a counterclaim.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 153728-2001 |
[2011] EWHC 27 (TCC), 12 January 2011. Concerns a claim by an architect (M) for payment of fees for work carried out for the defendants (R). M passed the debt on to a debt collection agency who caused damage to R's car in an attempt to make them pay the debt. The terms of engagement for the project were under dispute as they had not been properly set out in writing prior to the start of work, and some aspects of the work were not properly supervised by M. "Held": M is entitled to £42 047 in fees, however R is entitled to £58 880.98 as a counterclaim.