Bellcross Co Ltd v Mid Bedfordshire DC
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (8815) 16 April 1988, 106-108(2)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: QBD 11 December 1987. An application by a developer (B) to quash a tree preservation order made by M under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s245 in respect of a single mature yew tree which stood on the site of a proposed residential development for 230 houses. B had outline planning permission for the site, which involved removal of the tree, but when B applied for permission in respect of reserved matters it was refused because of the tpo despite an amendment to the plans to avoid removal of the tree. B claimed that an immaterial consideration had been allowed to influence M`s decision. B`s challenge was rejected. The court was not satisfied that M had improperly taken account of the fact that the tree was not directly to be damaged by the proposed development. Application dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS39098 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 14414-1001 |
QBD 11 December 1987. An application by a developer (B) to quash a tree preservation order made by M under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s245 in respect of a single mature yew tree which stood on the site of a proposed residential development for 230 houses. B had outline planning permission for the site, which involved removal of the tree, but when B applied for permission in respect of reserved matters it was refused because of the tpo despite an amendment to the plans to avoid removal of the tree. B claimed that an immaterial consideration had been allowed to influence M`s decision. B`s challenge was rejected. The court was not satisfied that M had improperly taken account of the fact that the tree was not directly to be damaged by the proposed development. Application dismissed.