Image from Google Jackets

South Staffordshire DC v SoS Environment and others

Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1988) 55 PCR 258-276(19)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: QBD 6 April 1987. Second respondents (B) carried on a business from 1941 to 1978 on land owned by the Ministry of Defence. In 1978 B acquired this land. In 1980 the council (S) served an enforcement notice alleging material change of use of the land to warehousing . B appealed and the notice was upheld in relation to the land but allowed in relation to the main warehouse building on the site, which had established use - by the MoD for storing vehicles. B was then granted consent to extend by 15000 sq ft and refurbish this warehouse subject to a condition that use be only for storage purposes within Class X of the Use Classes Order 1972 . Also there should be no storage on any other part of the site. Consent for offices and another warehouse was refused. Subsequently S served enforcement notices on B alleging change of use of the site and a failure to observe the condition. B appealed against refusal of planning permission and against the enforcement notices. The inspector held in fav
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS39101 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 14435-1001

QBD 6 April 1987. Second respondents (B) carried on a business from 1941 to 1978 on land owned by the Ministry of Defence. In 1978 B acquired this land. In 1980 the council (S) served an enforcement notice alleging material change of use of the land to warehousing . B appealed and the notice was upheld in relation to the land but allowed in relation to the main warehouse building on the site, which had established use - by the MoD for storing vehicles. B was then granted consent to extend by 15000 sq ft and refurbish this warehouse subject to a condition that use be only for storage purposes within Class X of the Use Classes Order 1972 . Also there should be no storage on any other part of the site. Consent for offices and another warehouse was refused. Subsequently S served enforcement notices on B alleging change of use of the site and a failure to observe the condition. B appealed against refusal of planning permission and against the enforcement notices. The inspector held in fav