Planning permission
Planning permission
- 2001
- Estates Gazette Case Summaries [2001] EGCS 34(1) (17/03/01) .
"R v Restormel BC, ex parte Corbett" CA 2 March 2001. L& P Property Ltd were granted 3 outline planning permissions enabling them to erect buildings for non-food retail use. As a result of an inquiry the grants of planning permission were found to be wrong as they conflicted with development plan policies. It was recommended that permission be modified by removing non-food retail use from the matters permitted enabling L&P to claim compensation. The appellant councillor applied to have this quashed. Held, the council had acted unlawfully in granting the 1997 permission and refused to quash it. The appellant appealed.
PLANNING PERMISSION
NEW DEVELOPMENT
RETAIL USE
R V RESTORMEL BC EX P CORBETT
"R v Restormel BC, ex parte Corbett" CA 2 March 2001. L& P Property Ltd were granted 3 outline planning permissions enabling them to erect buildings for non-food retail use. As a result of an inquiry the grants of planning permission were found to be wrong as they conflicted with development plan policies. It was recommended that permission be modified by removing non-food retail use from the matters permitted enabling L&P to claim compensation. The appellant councillor applied to have this quashed. Held, the council had acted unlawfully in granting the 1997 permission and refused to quash it. The appellant appealed.
PLANNING PERMISSION
NEW DEVELOPMENT
RETAIL USE
R V RESTORMEL BC EX P CORBETT