The Nottinghamshire and City of Nottingham Fire Authority v Gladman Commercial Properties and Nottingham City Council
The Nottinghamshire and City of Nottingham Fire Authority v Gladman Commercial Properties and Nottingham City Council
- 2011
[2011] EWHC 1918 (Ch), 20 April 2011. Should important evidence be allowed some time after a case has started?. Claimant NFA agreed to sell a fire station to Defendant and Part 20 Claimant G in 2007. Part 20 Defendant N agreed to sell adjacent land to G at the same time. G refused to complete both purchases, claiming fraudulent misrepresentation of the site by the agents of NFA and N. NFA and N wanted to call on evidence from a key witness after the beginning of the trial. G contended that it was unfair and costly to allow this late evidence. "Held": the evidence was allowed but G should be compensated for the delay.
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE AND CITY OF NOTTINGHAM FIRE AUTHORITY V GLADMAN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ANOTHER
CLAIRE SWAIN-MASON AND ORS V MILLS & REEVE (A FIRM)
England and Wales--1543-
[2011] EWHC 1918 (Ch), 20 April 2011. Should important evidence be allowed some time after a case has started?. Claimant NFA agreed to sell a fire station to Defendant and Part 20 Claimant G in 2007. Part 20 Defendant N agreed to sell adjacent land to G at the same time. G refused to complete both purchases, claiming fraudulent misrepresentation of the site by the agents of NFA and N. NFA and N wanted to call on evidence from a key witness after the beginning of the trial. G contended that it was unfair and costly to allow this late evidence. "Held": the evidence was allowed but G should be compensated for the delay.
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE AND CITY OF NOTTINGHAM FIRE AUTHORITY V GLADMAN COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES AND ANOTHER
CLAIRE SWAIN-MASON AND ORS V MILLS & REEVE (A FIRM)
England and Wales--1543-