Virtual reality: defining the world of rent review I and II
Gaunt, J
Virtual reality: defining the world of rent review I and II - 1994 - See also - Estates Gazette (9433) 20 August 1994, 88-91; (9434) 27 August 199 .
Abridged versions of papers presented at the 1994 Blundell Memorial Lectures. Part one examines current legal issues on rent reviews referring to caselaw, considers the consequences of the vacant possession assumption, fitting-out periods and incentives, premises fit for immediate use and occupation, disregard of rent-free periods, the assumption that a rent-free period has expired, and the assumption of compliance with repairing covenants. Part two looks at valuation aspects, including the effects of the development cycle, the effect of inducements on value, the role of the courts in dealing with rent review cases, built-in discounts, fitted-out assumptions and commercial bargaining in the property market.
99 BISHOPSGATE LTD V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD
BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
BLUNDELL MEMORIAL LECTURES 1994
BROADGATE SQUARE PLC V LEHMAN BROTHERS LTD
CITY OFFICES PLC V BRYANSTON INSURANCE CO LTD
CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE SOCIETY LTD V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER
DISREGARDS
FITTING-OUT PERIODS
HEADLINE RENT
ICELAND FROZEN FOODS PLC V STARLIGHT INVESTMENTS LTD
LAND SECURITIES PLC V CITY OF WESTMINSTER
LEASE INCENTIVES
LONDON & LEEDS ESTATES LTD V PARIBAS LTD
MALLINSON REPORT
ORCHID LODGE (UK) LTD V EXTEL COMPUTING LTD
PONTSARN INVESTMENTS LTD V KANSALLIS-OSAKE-PANKKI
PRUDENTIAL NOMINEES V GREENHAM TRADING
RENT REVIEWS
RENT-FREE PERIODS
SCOTTISH AMICABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY V MIDDLETON
VALUATION ISSUES
WINDFALL
Virtual reality: defining the world of rent review I and II - 1994 - See also - Estates Gazette (9433) 20 August 1994, 88-91; (9434) 27 August 199 .
Abridged versions of papers presented at the 1994 Blundell Memorial Lectures. Part one examines current legal issues on rent reviews referring to caselaw, considers the consequences of the vacant possession assumption, fitting-out periods and incentives, premises fit for immediate use and occupation, disregard of rent-free periods, the assumption that a rent-free period has expired, and the assumption of compliance with repairing covenants. Part two looks at valuation aspects, including the effects of the development cycle, the effect of inducements on value, the role of the courts in dealing with rent review cases, built-in discounts, fitted-out assumptions and commercial bargaining in the property market.
99 BISHOPSGATE LTD V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD
BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
BLUNDELL MEMORIAL LECTURES 1994
BROADGATE SQUARE PLC V LEHMAN BROTHERS LTD
CITY OFFICES PLC V BRYANSTON INSURANCE CO LTD
CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE SOCIETY LTD V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER
DISREGARDS
FITTING-OUT PERIODS
HEADLINE RENT
ICELAND FROZEN FOODS PLC V STARLIGHT INVESTMENTS LTD
LAND SECURITIES PLC V CITY OF WESTMINSTER
LEASE INCENTIVES
LONDON & LEEDS ESTATES LTD V PARIBAS LTD
MALLINSON REPORT
ORCHID LODGE (UK) LTD V EXTEL COMPUTING LTD
PONTSARN INVESTMENTS LTD V KANSALLIS-OSAKE-PANKKI
PRUDENTIAL NOMINEES V GREENHAM TRADING
RENT REVIEWS
RENT-FREE PERIODS
SCOTTISH AMICABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY V MIDDLETON
VALUATION ISSUES
WINDFALL