Arthur and Arthur v Anker
Arthur and Arthur v Anker
- 1995
- New Property Cases (1995) NPC 187 .
CA 30 November 1995. A trespasser in a car park who was aware that a wheelclamping regime was in operation fails, on grounds of volenti, to recover damages against the security firm which wheelclamped his vehicle. He is not, however damage feasant. Wheelclampers do not commit theft or in this case, blackmail in England. (Headnote from journal). NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.
CAR PARK
SECURITY FIRM
WHEELCLAMPING
CA 30 November 1995. A trespasser in a car park who was aware that a wheelclamping regime was in operation fails, on grounds of volenti, to recover damages against the security firm which wheelclamped his vehicle. He is not, however damage feasant. Wheelclampers do not commit theft or in this case, blackmail in England. (Headnote from journal). NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.
CAR PARK
SECURITY FIRM
WHEELCLAMPING