`Subject to contract` ambiguous

`Subject to contract` ambiguous - 1992 - Chartered Surveyor Weekly 40(10) 3 September 1992, 64(1) .

Preliminary attention in "Fraser Williams (Southern) Ltd v Prudential Holborn Ltd" HC 22 July 1992, was taken up with a decision as to whether the phrase `subject to contract` in correspondence required a formal contract or that a letter, arguably a letter of intent, could be taken as binding.


CONTRACT
SUBJECT TO CONTRACT