Permitted development
Permitted development
- 1994
- Estates Gazette Case Summaries (1994) EGCS 112(1) (25/6/94) .
"Peacock v SoS Environment and another" CA 14 June 1994. Replacement of a poultry house was not allowed as it would have been within 25m of a classified road and the development would be outside the exemptions under Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988. The appellants` submission that the GDO created a presumption in favour of development was dismissed. The building of a poultry house did not come within permitted development.
DISTANCE
FARM BUILDINGS
LIVESTOCK BUILDINGS
MAIN ROADS
PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING PERMISSION
PROPERTY-INFRASTRUCTURE-TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE-ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988
"Peacock v SoS Environment and another" CA 14 June 1994. Replacement of a poultry house was not allowed as it would have been within 25m of a classified road and the development would be outside the exemptions under Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988. The appellants` submission that the GDO created a presumption in favour of development was dismissed. The building of a poultry house did not come within permitted development.
DISTANCE
FARM BUILDINGS
LIVESTOCK BUILDINGS
MAIN ROADS
PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING PERMISSION
PROPERTY-INFRASTRUCTURE-TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE-ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988