Bush Transport Ltd v Nelson
Bush Transport Ltd v Nelson
- 1987
- Estates Gazette 281(6317) 17 January 1987, 177-183(4) .
CA 24 April 1986. Appeal by the landlords(L) against a decision in favour of the tenant(T), rejecting an application for possession of premises used as a repair shop: originally let on a tenancy agreement for seven years from 1977, at a rent of £2,600 pa, payable as £50 per week. When T entered into agreement with L, L offered to extend the term of T`s tenancy to 1991 at £65 per week with a three year rent review period. On consultation with his solicitor, T, decided not to take up the offer. Correspondence took place between the parties and eventually L brought proceedings for possession against T based on a section 25 notice served under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 . The judge found there had been an oral agreement granting T an extended tenancy to 1991 at the old rent with one review period in 1984. L appealed. On appeal, it was held in the light of Jenkin R Lewis and Son Ltd v Kerwan that this must have taken effect as an agreement to surrender the existing term and to creat
BUSINESS TENANCIES
NEW TENANCY
CA 24 April 1986. Appeal by the landlords(L) against a decision in favour of the tenant(T), rejecting an application for possession of premises used as a repair shop: originally let on a tenancy agreement for seven years from 1977, at a rent of £2,600 pa, payable as £50 per week. When T entered into agreement with L, L offered to extend the term of T`s tenancy to 1991 at £65 per week with a three year rent review period. On consultation with his solicitor, T, decided not to take up the offer. Correspondence took place between the parties and eventually L brought proceedings for possession against T based on a section 25 notice served under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 . The judge found there had been an oral agreement granting T an extended tenancy to 1991 at the old rent with one review period in 1984. L appealed. On appeal, it was held in the light of Jenkin R Lewis and Son Ltd v Kerwan that this must have taken effect as an agreement to surrender the existing term and to creat
BUSINESS TENANCIES
NEW TENANCY