Micrografix v Woking 8 Ltd
Micrografix v Woking 8 Ltd
- 1995
- Estates Gazette (1995) 37 EG 179-180(2) .
ChD 19 May 1995. In 1990 the applicant tenants (M) were granted a 20 year lease of a building. A provision in clause 8 of the lease terms allowed M to determine the lease at the end of the 5th year by giving the landlords (W) no less than 12-months notice. On 21 January 1994, M sent a letter to W stating that they were determining the lease on 23 March 1995, however the notice had 23 March 1994 on it and referred to clause 8. M applied for a declaration that the lease would determine on 23 June 1995. W denied that the letter or notice would determine the lease. Held, application allowed; the notice was valid.
BREAK CLAUSES
LEASES
MICROGRAFIX V WOKING 8 LTD
NOTICE TO DETERMINE
TERMINATION DATE
VALIDITY
WRONG TERMINATION DATE
ChD 19 May 1995. In 1990 the applicant tenants (M) were granted a 20 year lease of a building. A provision in clause 8 of the lease terms allowed M to determine the lease at the end of the 5th year by giving the landlords (W) no less than 12-months notice. On 21 January 1994, M sent a letter to W stating that they were determining the lease on 23 March 1995, however the notice had 23 March 1994 on it and referred to clause 8. M applied for a declaration that the lease would determine on 23 June 1995. W denied that the letter or notice would determine the lease. Held, application allowed; the notice was valid.
BREAK CLAUSES
LEASES
MICROGRAFIX V WOKING 8 LTD
NOTICE TO DETERMINE
TERMINATION DATE
VALIDITY
WRONG TERMINATION DATE