Killick v Roberts
Killick v Roberts
- 1991
- Estates Gazette (1991) 41 EG 133-136(3) .
CA 13 June 1991. The landlord, K, is owner of a bungalow let since 1986 as a holiday cottage between Easter and October; and during the winter months at a reduced rate to people requiring short term accommodation. By a written agreement dated 30 November 1988 K let the property to R, until 1 March 1989 with the option to extend weekly for four weeks, at a rent of £40/week. The tenancy was a protected tenancy for the purposes of Rent Act 1977. By a letter dated 6 February 1989 R exercised the option to extend the tenancy for four weeks until 29 March, however he did not vacate on that date and therefore became a statutory tenant. On 30 March R wrote to K asking to extend his occupation by a further four weeks, K refused and issued a summons claiming possession. R claimed that K had not, prior to commencement of the tenancy, given him written notice that possession of the bungalow might be required under Case 13 in Schedule 15 of the Act. K later issued additional claims for breaches b
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
HOLIDAY LETTINGS
PROTECTED TENANCIES
PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
SHORT TERM LETTINGS
STATUTORY TENANCIES
CA 13 June 1991. The landlord, K, is owner of a bungalow let since 1986 as a holiday cottage between Easter and October; and during the winter months at a reduced rate to people requiring short term accommodation. By a written agreement dated 30 November 1988 K let the property to R, until 1 March 1989 with the option to extend weekly for four weeks, at a rent of £40/week. The tenancy was a protected tenancy for the purposes of Rent Act 1977. By a letter dated 6 February 1989 R exercised the option to extend the tenancy for four weeks until 29 March, however he did not vacate on that date and therefore became a statutory tenant. On 30 March R wrote to K asking to extend his occupation by a further four weeks, K refused and issued a summons claiming possession. R claimed that K had not, prior to commencement of the tenancy, given him written notice that possession of the bungalow might be required under Case 13 in Schedule 15 of the Act. K later issued additional claims for breaches b
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
HOLIDAY LETTINGS
PROTECTED TENANCIES
PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
SHORT TERM LETTINGS
STATUTORY TENANCIES