C & J Seymour (Investments) Limited v Lewes DC
C & J Seymour (Investments) Limited v Lewes DC
- 1992
- Rating & Valuation Reporter (1992) 31 RVR 250-255(6) .
LT 22 July 1991. In June 1987 the council (L) published a draft local plan which identified a town centre site as an extension to a car park. This was adopted in April 1990. In September 1988 the claimant, C`s predecessor in title served a blight notice under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s192 to which L did not object. A deemed notice to treat therefore came into existence on 14 November 1988. On 31 May 1989 application was made for a certificate of appropriate alternative development under Land Compensation Act 1961 s17. In September L issued a certificate for residential development. At the date of the hearing L had not entered onto the land. In 1987 and 1988 consent for a residential development requested by C had been refused on the grounds that the land was earmarked for a car park and would damage a neighbouring conservation area. C sought compensation of £190,000 for the freehold interest with vacant possession. L`s figure was £26,000. The argument arose as to the valuat
BLIGHT NOTICES
CAR PARK
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Compulsory purchase
INJURIOUS AFFECTION
LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961 S17
LT DECISIONS
NOTICE TO TREAT
STOKES PRINCIPLE
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S192
VALUATION DATE
LT 22 July 1991. In June 1987 the council (L) published a draft local plan which identified a town centre site as an extension to a car park. This was adopted in April 1990. In September 1988 the claimant, C`s predecessor in title served a blight notice under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s192 to which L did not object. A deemed notice to treat therefore came into existence on 14 November 1988. On 31 May 1989 application was made for a certificate of appropriate alternative development under Land Compensation Act 1961 s17. In September L issued a certificate for residential development. At the date of the hearing L had not entered onto the land. In 1987 and 1988 consent for a residential development requested by C had been refused on the grounds that the land was earmarked for a car park and would damage a neighbouring conservation area. C sought compensation of £190,000 for the freehold interest with vacant possession. L`s figure was £26,000. The argument arose as to the valuat
BLIGHT NOTICES
CAR PARK
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Compulsory purchase
INJURIOUS AFFECTION
LAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961 S17
LT DECISIONS
NOTICE TO TREAT
STOKES PRINCIPLE
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S192
VALUATION DATE