Reviewing rents: hypothesis, reality and commercial purpose

McLoughlin, P.

Reviewing rents: hypothesis, reality and commercial purpose - 12(2) Winter 1991/92, 115-122(8) - Rent Review & Lease Renewal 12(2) Winter 1991/92, 115-122(8) .

With reference to case law, this article examines the purpose of rent reviews, discussing hypothesis v presumption of reality, disregards as to rent and the length of term of the hypothetical lease.


BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE BC V HOST GROUP LTD
BRITISH GAS CORPORATION V UNIVERSITIES SUPERANNUATION SCHEME
EQUITY AND LAW LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY PLC V BODFIELD LTD
LYNNTHORPE ENTERPRISES LTD V SIDNEY SMITH (CHELSEA) LTD
NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCLELLAND MOORES AND CO
NORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V TRUSTEE SAVINGS BANKS CENTRAL BOARD
PEARL ASSURANCE PLC V SHAW
PUGH V SMITHS INDUSTRIES LTD
RENT REVIEWS
RITZ HOTEL (LONDON) LTD V RITZ CASINO LTD
SI PENSION TRUSTEES LTD V MINISTERIO DE MARINA DE LA REPUBLICA PERUANA
TEA TRADE PROPERTIES LTD V CIN PROPERTIES LTD
LAW LAND CO LTD V CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION LTD
TOMLINSON (VO) V PLYMOUTH ARGYLE FOOTBALL CO LTD