Fit for use and occupation
Fit for use and occupation
- 1992
- Estates Gazette (9222) 6 June 1992, 117(1) .
Discusses the recent case "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki (Abs*****) which concerned the question of whether premises were `fit for immediate occupation and use` and the effects of this on rent review. Compares it to the cases "Jones v Sherwood Computer Services Ltd" and "Nikko Hotels (UK) Ltd v MEPC plc" (Abs44864).
FIT FOR OCCUPATION
FITTED OUT
RENT REVIEWS
Discusses the recent case "Pontsarn Investments Ltd v Kansallis-Osake-Pankki (Abs*****) which concerned the question of whether premises were `fit for immediate occupation and use` and the effects of this on rent review. Compares it to the cases "Jones v Sherwood Computer Services Ltd" and "Nikko Hotels (UK) Ltd v MEPC plc" (Abs44864).
FIT FOR OCCUPATION
FITTED OUT
RENT REVIEWS