Strandmill Ltd v Epping Forest DC
Strandmill Ltd v Epping Forest DC
- 1992
- Rating & Valuation Reporter (1992) 32 RVR 117-120(4) .
LT 3 March 1992. The claimant company S, occupied an area of mainly open land totalling 11.75ha, pursuant to a licence granted in 1988 which allowed them to use the land for a market in Sundays. In September 1988 they applied to the council for planning permission `to operate a market each Sunday`. In January 1989 this was refused. In March S appealed to SoS. In February the council had issued a direction under General Development Order 1988, whereby the permission granted by that order for use of land for holding markets on not more than 14 days a year was withdrawn. In January 1990 an inspector appointed by the SoS issued a decision following a local inquiry into S`s appeals against an enforcement notice and the councils refusal of planning permission dismissing both appeals. In July 1990 S claimed compensation under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s165. The council claimed that it was a condition for claim that the application for planning permission must be in the terms of an
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988
PLANNING PERMISSION
SUNDAY MARKETS
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S165
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S108
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING GENERAL REGULATIONS 1976
LT 3 March 1992. The claimant company S, occupied an area of mainly open land totalling 11.75ha, pursuant to a licence granted in 1988 which allowed them to use the land for a market in Sundays. In September 1988 they applied to the council for planning permission `to operate a market each Sunday`. In January 1989 this was refused. In March S appealed to SoS. In February the council had issued a direction under General Development Order 1988, whereby the permission granted by that order for use of land for holding markets on not more than 14 days a year was withdrawn. In January 1990 an inspector appointed by the SoS issued a decision following a local inquiry into S`s appeals against an enforcement notice and the councils refusal of planning permission dismissing both appeals. In July 1990 S claimed compensation under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s165. The council claimed that it was a condition for claim that the application for planning permission must be in the terms of an
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER 1988
PLANNING PERMISSION
SUNDAY MARKETS
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S165
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S108
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING GENERAL REGULATIONS 1976