Slot v Guildford BC
Slot v Guildford BC
- 1992
- Rating & Valuation Reporter 1992 32 RVR 126-144(9) .
LT 27 May 1992. A decision to determine the amount of compensation (if payable) under ss164 and 165 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 following refusal of planning permission on 15.07 ac of farmland in Ockham Surrey within metropolitian green belt. In January 1990, Guildford BC (G) made a direction under article 4 of the Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988 which included the land to which this case relates. This revoked permitted development rights formerly available under art 3 and pt 2 of class A of sch 2 to the 1988 GDO. In November 1990, the claimant (S) submitted an application for planning permission on the land for a glass house, storage barn and five fences. Permission was refused on the ground that (1) fencing would fragment open natural land (2) buildings were not required for agricultural purposes and (3) visual intrusion. S submitted a claim for compensation under s164(1) of the 1971 Act on 3 May 1991. The claim was in four parts (a) depreciat
ARTICLE 4 DIRECTIONS
COMPENSATION
GREEN BELT
PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
PLANNING PERMISSION
REFUSAL
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S164
LT 27 May 1992. A decision to determine the amount of compensation (if payable) under ss164 and 165 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971 following refusal of planning permission on 15.07 ac of farmland in Ockham Surrey within metropolitian green belt. In January 1990, Guildford BC (G) made a direction under article 4 of the Town and Country Planning General Development Order 1988 which included the land to which this case relates. This revoked permitted development rights formerly available under art 3 and pt 2 of class A of sch 2 to the 1988 GDO. In November 1990, the claimant (S) submitted an application for planning permission on the land for a glass house, storage barn and five fences. Permission was refused on the ground that (1) fencing would fragment open natural land (2) buildings were not required for agricultural purposes and (3) visual intrusion. S submitted a claim for compensation under s164(1) of the 1971 Act on 3 May 1991. The claim was in four parts (a) depreciat
ARTICLE 4 DIRECTIONS
COMPENSATION
GREEN BELT
PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
PLANNING PERMISSION
REFUSAL
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 S164