R v SoS for Transport ex parte Blackett
R v SoS for Transport ex parte Blackett
- 1992
- Journal of Planning and Environment Law 1992 JPL 1041-1043(2) .
QBD 15 November 1991. A compulsory purchase order was obtained by the SoS on the land in question, which was the site of the Battle of Naseby, for a trunk road. This was challenged by the applicants but was rejected. The SoS gave notice to treat on 24 May 1991 in relation to a plot of the land with reference number NN130824. The cpo was served on the owner of the land on 7 June 1989. The land was sold to the two trustees who are trustees of the Society for the Preservation of the Field of Battle of Naseby sometime in 1989. From September 1990 parcels of land one square foot in dimension and spread all over the area in question were sold to a number of purchasers including the applicant. On 25 October 1991 the SoS issued notices of entry. This was challenged on the grounds that the Notice to Treat on the two trustees was not proper service so far as the applicant was concerned because she was not served with a Notice on 24 May in respect of her square foot of land. The SoS had checked
BATTLEFIELD SITES
BATTLE OF NASEBY
COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S75
NOTICE TO TREAT
PARCELS OF LAND
QBD 15 November 1991. A compulsory purchase order was obtained by the SoS on the land in question, which was the site of the Battle of Naseby, for a trunk road. This was challenged by the applicants but was rejected. The SoS gave notice to treat on 24 May 1991 in relation to a plot of the land with reference number NN130824. The cpo was served on the owner of the land on 7 June 1989. The land was sold to the two trustees who are trustees of the Society for the Preservation of the Field of Battle of Naseby sometime in 1989. From September 1990 parcels of land one square foot in dimension and spread all over the area in question were sold to a number of purchasers including the applicant. On 25 October 1991 the SoS issued notices of entry. This was challenged on the grounds that the Notice to Treat on the two trustees was not proper service so far as the applicant was concerned because she was not served with a Notice on 24 May in respect of her square foot of land. The SoS had checked
BATTLEFIELD SITES
BATTLE OF NASEBY
COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 1965 S75
NOTICE TO TREAT
PARCELS OF LAND