Good and another v Epping Forest DC
Good and another v Epping Forest DC
- 1993
- Journal of Planning and Environment Law (1993) JPEL 127-133 (7) .
ChD 14 April 1992. The applicants sought a declaration that a s52 agreement in which the previous farm owner had covenanted that the dwellinghouse he wanted to build would be occupied by someone in agriculture and that the house would not be sold apart from the rest of the farm, was ultra vires, null and void. At issue was the use by the local planning authority of such a stringent s52 agreement rather than including these provisions in the condition for planning permission. The claim was dismissed.
AGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY
DOE CIRCULAR 01/1985
GREEN BELT
PLANNING AGREEMENTS
PLANNING CONDITIONS
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
PLANNING PERMISSION
PPG7
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
S52 AGREEMENTS
ChD 14 April 1992. The applicants sought a declaration that a s52 agreement in which the previous farm owner had covenanted that the dwellinghouse he wanted to build would be occupied by someone in agriculture and that the house would not be sold apart from the rest of the farm, was ultra vires, null and void. At issue was the use by the local planning authority of such a stringent s52 agreement rather than including these provisions in the condition for planning permission. The claim was dismissed.
AGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY
DOE CIRCULAR 01/1985
GREEN BELT
PLANNING AGREEMENTS
PLANNING CONDITIONS
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS
PLANNING PERMISSION
PPG7
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
S52 AGREEMENTS