Reed v SoS for the Environment and Tandridge DC
Reed v SoS for the Environment and Tandridge DC
- 1993
- Journal of Planning and Environment Law 1993 JPL 249-253(3) .
QBD 6 May 1992. The appellant had an agricultural holding in the Metropolitan Green Belt and was served by the council with 10 enforcement notices alleging change of use of certain buildings on the holding. There was no planning permission for these uses. The appellant appealed against the enforcement notices but this was dismissed. They appealed to the High Court. It was held that each enforcement notice should be considered individually as permission could not be refused for use of a particular site by virtue of uses on other sites unless there is a convincing and legitimate reason.
CHANGE OF USE
ENFORCMENT NOTICES
GREEN BELT
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S177(5)
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1991
QBD 6 May 1992. The appellant had an agricultural holding in the Metropolitan Green Belt and was served by the council with 10 enforcement notices alleging change of use of certain buildings on the holding. There was no planning permission for these uses. The appellant appealed against the enforcement notices but this was dismissed. They appealed to the High Court. It was held that each enforcement notice should be considered individually as permission could not be refused for use of a particular site by virtue of uses on other sites unless there is a convincing and legitimate reason.
CHANGE OF USE
ENFORCMENT NOTICES
GREEN BELT
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S177(5)
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1991