Booth and Booth v British Coal Corporation
Booth and Booth v British Coal Corporation
- 1993
- Rating & Valuation Reporter (1993) RVR 65-69(5) .
LT 11 November 1992. The court had preliminary issues to decide: whether the claimants were required to complete another damage notice or could rely on one made some years earlier, since when only emergency repairs had been carried out on the property, affected by mining subsidence, and whether a deferment notice had been served by the corporation and subsequently revoked. The tribunal found in favour of the claimants, who relied on Coal Mining (Subsidence) Act 1957 s3(3).
COAL MINING (SUBSIDENCE) ACT 1957
COAL MINING
COMPENSATION
DAMAGE NOTICE
MINING SUBSIDENCE
REPAIRS
SUBSIDENCE
LT 11 November 1992. The court had preliminary issues to decide: whether the claimants were required to complete another damage notice or could rely on one made some years earlier, since when only emergency repairs had been carried out on the property, affected by mining subsidence, and whether a deferment notice had been served by the corporation and subsequently revoked. The tribunal found in favour of the claimants, who relied on Coal Mining (Subsidence) Act 1957 s3(3).
COAL MINING (SUBSIDENCE) ACT 1957
COAL MINING
COMPENSATION
DAMAGE NOTICE
MINING SUBSIDENCE
REPAIRS
SUBSIDENCE