Taylor v Courage Ltd
Taylor v Courage Ltd
- (1993 44 EG 116-124(6)
- Estates Gazette (1993 44 EG 116-124(6) .
CA 19 June 1993. Having extended the pub to include a new kitchen and dining the publican T, applied for an extension of his lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 pt II. This was refused at the county court on the grounds that his was not a protected tenancy by virtue of the exception made by s43(1)(d)(i): the premises were not a restaurant. T argued on appeal that he engaged in restaurant business on the site and therefore the tenancy fell within the proviso to s43(1)(d)(i) and was protected. The court agreed and allowed the appeal. Although the pub was not a restaurant, the Act did not so require: restaurant facilities were provided on the site.
BUSINESS TENANCIES
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S43(1)(D)(I)
NEW TENANCIES
PUB LEASES
CA 19 June 1993. Having extended the pub to include a new kitchen and dining the publican T, applied for an extension of his lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 pt II. This was refused at the county court on the grounds that his was not a protected tenancy by virtue of the exception made by s43(1)(d)(i): the premises were not a restaurant. T argued on appeal that he engaged in restaurant business on the site and therefore the tenancy fell within the proviso to s43(1)(d)(i) and was protected. The court agreed and allowed the appeal. Although the pub was not a restaurant, the Act did not so require: restaurant facilities were provided on the site.
BUSINESS TENANCIES
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S43(1)(D)(I)
NEW TENANCIES
PUB LEASES