Mount Charlotte Investments plc v Prudential Assurance
Mount Charlotte Investments plc v Prudential Assurance
- 1995
- Estates Gazette (1995) 10 EG 129-132(4) .
ChD 12 July 1994. An arbitrator, in determining a rent review, failed to follow his own instructions setting out what evidence of comparables would be taken as admissible. M, the tenant, objected and applied to the court for an extension of time and, under the Arbitration Act 1950 ss22 or 23, set aside or remit the award because of the arbitrator`s misconduct. Application granted, the court holding that there was misconduct, and the award set aside.
ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
ARBITRATION ACT 1950 S22
ARBITRATION ACT 1950 S23
ARBITRATORS
COMPARABLES
EXTENSION OF TIME
MISCONDUCT
MOUNT CHARLOTTE INVESTMENTS PLC V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE
RENT REVIEWS
RSC 73 R5
ChD 12 July 1994. An arbitrator, in determining a rent review, failed to follow his own instructions setting out what evidence of comparables would be taken as admissible. M, the tenant, objected and applied to the court for an extension of time and, under the Arbitration Act 1950 ss22 or 23, set aside or remit the award because of the arbitrator`s misconduct. Application granted, the court holding that there was misconduct, and the award set aside.
ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE
ARBITRATION ACT 1950 S22
ARBITRATION ACT 1950 S23
ARBITRATORS
COMPARABLES
EXTENSION OF TIME
MISCONDUCT
MOUNT CHARLOTTE INVESTMENTS PLC V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE
RENT REVIEWS
RSC 73 R5