Bailey and Bailey v Supasnaps Ltd
Bailey and Bailey v Supasnaps Ltd
- 1995
- Property and Compensation Reports (1995) 70 P&CR 450-458(9) .
CA 17 May 1995. An appeal against the decision that the lessors` rent review notice dated 9 October 1991 had not been served in time was allowed. The confusion surrounded the fact that the lease stated the period of notice should be `a clear period of two quarters`, the appeal judge argued that the rental period expired at the very last moment of 23 June 1992 (one of the quarter days) so provided a notice was served before 24 December 1991 it was in fact valid.
BAILEY AND BAILEY V SUPASNAPS LTD
NOTICE PERIOD
OPEN MARKET RENT
QUARTER DAYS
RENT REVIEWS
TIME LIMITS
CA 17 May 1995. An appeal against the decision that the lessors` rent review notice dated 9 October 1991 had not been served in time was allowed. The confusion surrounded the fact that the lease stated the period of notice should be `a clear period of two quarters`, the appeal judge argued that the rental period expired at the very last moment of 23 June 1992 (one of the quarter days) so provided a notice was served before 24 December 1991 it was in fact valid.
BAILEY AND BAILEY V SUPASNAPS LTD
NOTICE PERIOD
OPEN MARKET RENT
QUARTER DAYS
RENT REVIEWS
TIME LIMITS