Bickenhall Engineering Co Ltd v Grandmet Restaurants Ltd
Bickenhall Engineering Co Ltd v Grandmet Restaurants Ltd
- 1995
- Estates Gazette (1995) 10 EG 123-129(7) .
CA 29 July 1995. G, the appellant, held premises on a lease from B, where the rent review clause provided for a market rent to be set by the landlord, provided no counternotice was received from the tenant in the five weeks following service of the review notice. This in fact happened, with G`s counternotice being issued after the specified five weeks. B was granted arrears of rent and G appealed claiming that time was not of the essence. Appeal allowed.
BICKENHALL ENGINEERING CO LTD V GRANDMET RESTAURANTS
RENT REVIEWS
TIME OF THE ESSENCE
UNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC
CA 29 July 1995. G, the appellant, held premises on a lease from B, where the rent review clause provided for a market rent to be set by the landlord, provided no counternotice was received from the tenant in the five weeks following service of the review notice. This in fact happened, with G`s counternotice being issued after the specified five weeks. B was granted arrears of rent and G appealed claiming that time was not of the essence. Appeal allowed.
BICKENHALL ENGINEERING CO LTD V GRANDMET RESTAURANTS
RENT REVIEWS
TIME OF THE ESSENCE
UNITED SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS LTD V BURNLEY BC