Handling nuisance claims: the duty to abate a hazard
Wignall, G.
Handling nuisance claims: the duty to abate a hazard - 1998 - Solicitors` Journal 142(30) 31 July 1998, 720-721(2) .
Rejects a suggestion that it is time to call a halt to the law of private nuisance by physical damage and to subsume all such cases into the law of negligence. Since the law of private nuisance is a robust tort with significant practical advantages to the plaintiff and it is important in understanding the relationship between nuisance and negligence.
BARKER V HERBERT
BRADBURN V LINDSAY
BRS V SLATER
CAMBRIDGE WATER CO LTD V EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER PLC (CA)
GILES V WALKER
GOLDMAN V HARGRAVE
HAZARDS
HUNTER V CANARY WHARF
HUSSAIN V LANCASTER CC
JOB EDWARDS V BIRMINGHAM NAVIGATIONS
LANDOWNERS
NEGLIGENCE
PAGE MOTORS V EPSOM AND EWELL BC
PHYSICAL DAMAGE
PONTARDAWE RC V MOORE-GWYN
PRIVATE NUISANCE
RADSTOCK CO-OPERATIVE V NORTON-RADSTOCK
RYLANDS V FLETCHER
SAINT V JENNER
SEDLEIGH-DENFIELD V O'CALLAGHAN
SMITH V LITTLEWOODS ORGANISATION LTD
SPARKE V OSBORNE
TATE AND LYLE INDUSTRIES V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL
Handling nuisance claims: the duty to abate a hazard - 1998 - Solicitors` Journal 142(30) 31 July 1998, 720-721(2) .
Rejects a suggestion that it is time to call a halt to the law of private nuisance by physical damage and to subsume all such cases into the law of negligence. Since the law of private nuisance is a robust tort with significant practical advantages to the plaintiff and it is important in understanding the relationship between nuisance and negligence.
BARKER V HERBERT
BRADBURN V LINDSAY
BRS V SLATER
CAMBRIDGE WATER CO LTD V EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER PLC (CA)
GILES V WALKER
GOLDMAN V HARGRAVE
HAZARDS
HUNTER V CANARY WHARF
HUSSAIN V LANCASTER CC
JOB EDWARDS V BIRMINGHAM NAVIGATIONS
LANDOWNERS
NEGLIGENCE
PAGE MOTORS V EPSOM AND EWELL BC
PHYSICAL DAMAGE
PONTARDAWE RC V MOORE-GWYN
PRIVATE NUISANCE
RADSTOCK CO-OPERATIVE V NORTON-RADSTOCK
RYLANDS V FLETCHER
SAINT V JENNER
SEDLEIGH-DENFIELD V O'CALLAGHAN
SMITH V LITTLEWOODS ORGANISATION LTD
SPARKE V OSBORNE
TATE AND LYLE INDUSTRIES V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL