What might have been
Elliott, T.
What might have been - 1995 - Building 260(7887) 7 April 1995, 33(1) .
A reminder that in a loss and expense claim following overrunning, a contractor must be able to show that the delay prevented new work being undertaken, that work was indeed available and that the tender would have been won.
BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
CAPITAL ELECTRIC CO V UNITED STATES
CLAIMS
CONTRACT CLAIMS
DELAY
EICHLEAY FORMULA
HUDSON FORMULA
JF FINNEGAN LTD V SHEFFIELD CC
LOSS AND EXPENSE
UNITED STATES
What might have been - 1995 - Building 260(7887) 7 April 1995, 33(1) .
A reminder that in a loss and expense claim following overrunning, a contractor must be able to show that the delay prevented new work being undertaken, that work was indeed available and that the tender would have been won.
BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
CAPITAL ELECTRIC CO V UNITED STATES
CLAIMS
CONTRACT CLAIMS
DELAY
EICHLEAY FORMULA
HUDSON FORMULA
JF FINNEGAN LTD V SHEFFIELD CC
LOSS AND EXPENSE
UNITED STATES