Starling v Lloyds Bank
Starling v Lloyds Bank
- 1999
- New Property Cases [1999] NPC 129 (3) .
CA 29 October 1999. In the absence of a contractual obligation or bad faith a lender owes a boroower no duty of care when considering an application for consent to let mortgaged property. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED
LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
BAD FAITH
BORROWERS
CONSENT
MORTGAGES
STARLING V LLOYDS BANK
CA 29 October 1999. In the absence of a contractual obligation or bad faith a lender owes a boroower no duty of care when considering an application for consent to let mortgaged property. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED
LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
BAD FAITH
BORROWERS
CONSENT
MORTGAGES
STARLING V LLOYDS BANK